![]() I'm sure the Behringer is tired after so many gigs, but it just sounds like mud compared to the JBL. Bass response was immediate and decisive. It seems to have so much more spatial depth - the "bell tones" in my EP's were much more realistic, and all of the many dimensions of my bread and butter patches were so much more. The JBL, on the other hand, will cut your head off at the neck if you're not careful. Missing some depth in the mid-high range. But how? In comparison, the Behringer sounded dull. Since re-coning a speaker isn't rocket science, I'm pretty sure I got it right.įirst the obvious: the Eon sounded way better than the Behringer. I re-coned it, so that's either an advantage or a liability, depending on who you ask. The JBL is a first-generation 15" Powered Eon. Believe it or not.ġ5" speaker, mid-range, and horn tweeter. The Behringer in question is my faithful (!) old K1200 keyboard amp which has been on several hundred gigs at high volume with nary a hiccup. I used my Kurz PC1x for comparison since that's what I do 95% of my playing on.Īdded bonus was I also set up my Yamaha S03 and MM6 to do a true comparison. the wife was away and I didn't have any pressing "honey-dos"), so I wired it all up with an A/B switch. I happen to own both, and had some time to waste (i.e. But how do they *really* sound when directly compared? OK, we all know the high disregard in which Behringer is held in this forum, and the equal high pedestal upon which we place JBL Eons. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |